
Today I linked to an Oxfam America blog post that I’d tweeted yesterday:
.@oxfamamerica on how dependence on imported rice leaves Haitians vulnerable to volatile world prices: http://bit.ly/1aODKM3
That was after blogging last week about why most people shouldn’t care about food sovereignty.
A friend responded on Facebook today with this comment: “The Oxfam article speaks directly to the importance of food sovereignty. Indeed, I was surprised by the views you expressed in your recent post on this topic.” I tried to make a few points in that blog post last week, but some may have been too implicit or could be expanded upon.
One point is that food sovereignty really doesn’t matter, so long as a nation can produce other valuable goods and services. Think Japan, for instance. Wikipedia says that Japan is the world’s fourth-largest food-importer. The island doesn’t produce enough food to feed its 127 million residents, but it doesn’t have to—Wikipedia also notes that it’s the world’s fourth-largest exporter. Japan produces cars and electronics and machinery instead and buys food from abroad.
Another point I tried to make is that Haiti is probably pretty far away from competing with ‘Miami rice,’ the subsidized grain that’s imported from the United States and accounts for 80 percent of rice consumed by Haitians. Leave aside the U.S. farm bill, which is about as entrenched and inert as legislation gets. Haiti’s lack of irrigation, low soil fertility exacerbated by deforestation and erosion, and lack of capital and technology for farming make it quite hard to compete with super-efficient American agribusinesses. But Haiti is probably in a much better position to compete with Dominican chickens, eggs, and produce. So perhaps instead of trying to paddle against the tsunami that is subsidized production of ‘Miami rice,’ some or even many Haitians could be better served by trying to merely swim upstream and focus on efficiently producing other foodstuffs.
Or, to hedge against volatility of world rice prices, maybe Haitians should eat less rice? It’s shit nutritionally anyway. Perhaps the egg and protein renaissance is near.
I’m not saying, normatively, that all of these things should or even will happen. And given the current state of agriculture in the country, Haiti most certainly has a lot of room to try to improve and increase rice production. But the topic of food production and imports in the country begs for a lot more complex analysis than simply saying, “Haiti should grow more rice so that the country can one day ‘feed itself.’” Way too many Haitians and non-Haitians are wont to tell that story.
Let’s say that Haiti magically increased production tomorrow, Haitians consumed 100 percent Haitian rice, and the country even exported some rice to the Dominican Republic. Haitians would still be subject to some price volatility, like from a drought or from an especially bad hurricane season that destroyed a swath of the rice crop one year. The best way to really hedge against risk from food prices is to have a diversified economy that adds value in many different areas.
Alas, Haiti is an island, but it is not Japan.
Lately, I keep winding up in the same depressing place after working on various Haiti stories on disparate topics. These stories keep leading me to the same simple conclusion that’s apparent at even a quick glance but becomes depressing when you see first-hand how following so many paths within the story of the Haitian economy can lead you to the exact same place.
That conclusion: Haiti somehow has to transition from a country that depends on foreign aid for half of its budget to a country that produces a sizable amount of stuff that people, somewhere, want to buy. It can be Artibonite rice or Caracol t-shirts or Thiotte coffee or a combination of all of them and much more. But to be able to feed the country one day, Haitians have to figure out which things of value they’re relatively well-suited to produce, and how to produce them at considerable scale. And there’s no reason for that sort of long-term development to happen when half of the nation’s budget comes from donors who almost by definition have a shorter-term outlook than Haitians.
Photo by me